What's the difference between TB500 and thymosin beta-4?
20 posts
I keep reading them used interchangeably but also separately. Which is it? Is it just branding?
9 Replies
68 posts
Depends on the supplier. Most research-grade "TB500" is the full Tβ4. Some are a fragment (LKKTETQ + stabilizers). Read the COA if you care — mass / molecular weight tells you which.
- Epithalon · 10 mg · 10d on / 80d off · sub-Q
- MOTS-c · 5 mg · 2x/wk · sub-Q
- 5-Amino-1MQ · 150 mg · daily · oral
20 posts
@theoretic so if I buy "TB500" am I getting the full protein or the fragment?
68 posts
Thymosin beta-4 (Tβ4) is a 43-amino-acid protein naturally produced in the body. "TB500" is a marketing/research name for a synthetic fragment, often cited as the "active region" of Tβ4. In practice, most "TB500" products are either the full Tβ4 sequence or a fragment, and suppliers label inconsistently. Functionally in the research-peptide world, people use them interchangeably. Mechanistically, they're related but not technically identical.
- Epithalon · 10 mg · 10d on / 80d off · sub-Q
- MOTS-c · 5 mg · 2x/wk · sub-Q
- 5-Amino-1MQ · 150 mg · daily · oral
71 posts
This is a good thread to bookmark because "what's TB500" is asked weekly and the answer is "the labels are a mess and you should read your COA."
20 posts
28 posts
Username checks out, confirming that in 4 years of running "TB500" I've used both fragment and full Tβ4 products with indistinguishable subjective outcomes. n=1.
117 posts
FYI: the "active fragment" story is widely repeated but the underlying claim that the fragment alone is sufficient isn't super well-supported outside marketing material. Full Tβ4 is what almost all the published work uses.
30 posts
honestly the whole thing is just suppliers labeling whatever they have as TB500 because it's the shorter, catchier name. I got curious enough to actually look at some third party testing results a while back and yeah, total mess. some were legit full sequence, some were the fragment, some were honestly suspect. ended up just going with whatever had a decent COA and stopped worrying about the semantics. either way I noticed recovery improvements so maybe the difference doesn't matter as much as everyone pretends it does.