Does GHK-Cu actually do anything for hair or is that marketing
10 posts
I see it everywhere for skin + hair. Skin I sort of buy. Hair seems dubious. Real people with real results or are we just funding the supplement industry?
9 Replies
205 posts
The topical copper peptide literature on hair is mostly in vitro / follicle biology stuff + some small human studies for scalp health. It's not finasteride. For androgenic hair loss it's adjunct at best. Skin benefits (collagen, pigmentation, wound healing) have more consistent data.
- CJC-1295 no DAC ยท 100 mcg ยท pre-bed ยท sub-Q
- Ipamorelin ยท 200 mcg ยท pre-bed ยท sub-Q
- BPC-157 ยท 500 mcg ยท 2x/day ยท sub-Q
115 posts
Honest answer: if you want to keep your hair, minoxidil + finasteride (or dutasteride) + microneedling have the real evidence. GHK-Cu is a supporting actor, not the lead. Companies market it aggressively because it's not a controlled compound.
71 posts
^ this. If someone tells you they "grew their hair back with GHK-Cu only" they're either lying, a unicorn, or also doing other things they're not mentioning.
10 posts
Ok so short answer, not a miracle, useful for skin, mild adjunct for hair if anything. Got it.
46 posts
I run GHK topically post-microneedling and subjectively it helps scalp inflammation and recovery. Not claiming regrowth. Just skin health.
50 posts
Iron, ferritin, and vitamin D pretty much always get overlooked in "hair loss" complaints. Pull labs before you blame genetics.
34 posts
Also: scalp microneedling + minoxidil alone does more than most people realize. Before adding peptides, nail the basics.
10 posts
Good call. Booked a lab panel. Will start with the basics before the fancy stuff.