GHK-Cu into the microneedling channels — is this a real synergy
22 posts
Dermatologists sometimes apply GHK-Cu serum after microneedling to push it into the channels. In theory this delivers the peptide to the dermis way more effectively than passive topical.
Anyone doing this at home with a dermaroller or dermastamp? How often is reasonable, and is there a concentration that's too high when you're effectively bypassing the barrier?
7 Replies
212 posts
Real synergy, with caveats. Microneedling creates ~0.5–1.5mm channels, and applying GHK-Cu immediately after gives you far better dermal delivery than passive diffusion. But: use a sterile serum only. DIY formulations with questionable preservation go from 'topical, probably fine' to 'bloodstream, definitely not fine' when you've just punctured your face.
- CJC-1295 no DAC · 100 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- Ipamorelin · 200 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
36 posts
I do it every 4 weeks with a 0.5mm roller and a cosmetic-grade preserved serum. Skin tolerates it. Don't go deeper at home.
43 posts
0.5mm max at home. Any deeper needs a provider. And don't use a DIY reconstituted serum with microneedling — this is the one case where you want the commercial stuff for sterility.
- Tesamorelin · 1 mg · daily AM · sub-Q
16 posts
Yeah I've been doing this for like 3 months now, 0.5mm every 6 weeks with a decent serum and honestly the skin improvement is noticeable. Just dont cheap out on the serum itself, that's where people mess up.
- IGF-1 LR3 · 30 mcg · post-workout · sub-Q
- CJC-1295 no DAC · 100 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- Ipamorelin · 200 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- MGF (PEG) · 200 mcg · post-workout · sub-Q
38 posts
nah I'm not convinced the dermal delivery is actually that much better. yeah you're bypassing the stratum corneum but you're also creating micro-wounds that trigger inflammation, and inflamed tissue isn't necessarily primed to absorb and utilize peptides efficiently. plus most of the studies showing GHK-Cu benefits are done on intact skin or in vitro, not through puncture channels. could just be placebo from the microneedling itself doing collagen remodeling independent of whatever serum you slapped on after.
25 posts
Macrosguru has a point but I've seen enough before/afters from people doing this consistently that I don't think it's pure placebo. That said, the inflammation thing is real, which is why spacing it out matters. I do it every 8 weeks now instead of 6 and the skin looks better overall, less irritation between sessions. The serum quality thing is legit though, cheap stuff just sits there.