Pre-bed vs pre-workout for GH secretagogues — the real argument
71 posts
This gets rehashed every month and I want to settle the pieces that can be settled.
Facts I believe are uncontroversial:
- Endogenous GH pulse is largest during early SWS, typically within 60-90 min of sleep onset.
- GHRH + GHRP synergy creates a supra-physiological pulse that overrides or augments the endogenous pulse.
- Pulse requires fasted state (2-3hr post carb, 1hr post protein minimum) to not be blunted by insulin/FFA.
Debate:
- Pre-bed: stacks on the endogenous pulse, maximal total AUC. Downside: cortisol bounce in some responders, bad sleep for 2-3 days into a cycle.
- Pre-workout: takes advantage of exercise-induced GH pulse synergy, IGF-1 bumps may support session performance indirectly, cleaner for people who hate the sleep perturbation.
- Split: 2-3x per day, smaller pulses, chases total IGF-1 over any single big pulse.
My take: pre-bed is the most 'bang per pin' if you respond cleanly. If you don't, split dosing is the hedge. Pre-workout alone is leaving AUC on the table.
Fight me.
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
- GHK-Cu · 2 mg · nightly topical · topical
24 Replies
94 posts
Mostly agree. One nuance — for GHRH alone (no GHRP), pre-bed stacking is huge. For GHRP alone (hexarelin, GHRP-2), the bigger pulse comes from augmenting an existing stimulus (exercise or sleep), so timing matters less and 'whenever fasted' often works fine.
- CJC-1295 no DAC · 100 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- Ipamorelin · 200 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- BPC-157 · 250 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
205 posts
The cortisol bounce thing is real and under-discussed. My n=1: tirzepatide + pre-bed Ipa stacked my 3am wakeups for a solid two weeks of a cycle. Split dosing fixed it.
- CJC-1295 no DAC · 100 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- Ipamorelin · 200 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
41 posts
I run pre-bed only during weight-loss blocks (want the fat ox + the sleep-adjacent lipolysis window) and split during bulks (want the IGF steady state). Different goals, different dosing.
39 posts
Define 'AUC' though. 24hr IGF-1 AUC is the downstream proxy. Acute GH AUC from the pulse is a different thing and arguably less relevant for most goals here. If IGF is your target, consistent pulses across the day probably beats one monster pulse.
71 posts
@the_stats_guy fair point — I was sloppy. I meant IGF-1 AUC, and you're right that steady pulsing probably outperforms single spike for IGF. Concede.
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
- GHK-Cu · 2 mg · nightly topical · topical
115 posts
The 'fat ox during sleep' mechanism via pre-bed GH is often overstated. The direct GH-on-adipocyte lipolysis signal is modest compared to the fasting state itself. Pre-bed mostly works because it stacks on sleep pulse, not because it's magically fat burning at night.
71 posts
@restwise that matches my experience. Week 1 sleep is great, week 3 it's meh, week 5 it's worse than baseline. Part of why I don't run more than 6 weeks pre-bed before switching to split.
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
- GHK-Cu · 2 mg · nightly topical · topical
23 posts
Pre-workout camp here. I train fasted at 5:30am, pre-workout pin is easy and it doesn't muck with sleep. IGF gains are solid, no cortisol weirdness. I don't care about optimal if it's unsustainable.
94 posts
@slow_titrate yes. Pre-bed high-dose → more AM water retention, more morning stiffness. Split dosing → chronic low-grade but less peak. Pre-workout → least of all three in my experience because the exercise 'uses' the pulse rather than it pooling.
- CJC-1295 no DAC · 100 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- Ipamorelin · 200 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- BPC-157 · 250 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
25 posts
Any difference in AE profile between the three timings that people have noticed? Water retention, joint stiffness, CTS-like symptoms?
22 posts
71 posts
@new2peptides 2-3hr post a mixed meal, 1hr post protein-only, 45min post trace carbs. Plain water fine. Electrolytes with no carbs fine. Anything that spikes insulin will blunt the pulse.
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
- GHK-Cu · 2 mg · nightly topical · topical
25 posts
Dumb question — what's 'fasted' mean in this context, zero calories for 2hr or 3hr? And does water with electrolytes break it?
71 posts
@taper_time strongly agree on desensitization. It's why I hard-cap at 8 weeks and take a 4 week off. Diminishing returns after week 6 in my data.
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
- GHK-Cu · 2 mg · nightly topical · topical
16 posts
Hot take: past 6 weeks on any GHRH/GHRP combo the timing debate is moot because the pituitary is desensitized regardless. Cycle duration > pulse timing.
71 posts
@cycle_wrangler I've tried 5/2. Felt like it helped. No labs to confirm though, just subjective. Worth experimenting with.
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
- GHK-Cu · 2 mg · nightly topical · topical
18 posts
Anyone tried 5-on/2-off weekly pulsing to delay desensitization? I've been running it for ~10 weeks without the usual plateau feel.
71 posts
There's a Sigalos review (2018) that argues for 2-3x daily dosing as the more physiologic approach. Not a trial, but a reasonable framing for this whole debate.
205 posts
For anyone landing on this thread later — the TL;DR is: there's no single best timing. Match timing to your goal, your schedule, and your sleep response. Stop asking whether pre-bed 'is better' in a vacuum.
- CJC-1295 no DAC · 100 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- Ipamorelin · 200 mcg · pre-bed · sub-Q
- BPC-157 · 500 mcg · 2x/day · sub-Q
46 posts
Great thread. Would love a poll at the end: % of regulars using pre-bed / pre-workout / split / AM. Gut says split is most common among the vets.
9 posts
Split is most common among people who measure. Pre-bed is most common among people who read Reddit. Draw your own conclusions.